Category: Police Related

  • Delhi Officer Arrested on Drug Charges

    Delhi Officer Arrested on Drug Charges

    Update: Hall is associated with the Delhi PD

    Derrick Hall, who is allegedly a police officer in Delhi, has been arrested by LSPO for drug charges, obscenity, and no insurance. I have received several tips that he works for the police department but at this time, I have not received a response to officially confirm. Some tipsters also say that he has other criminal offenses from the past. I have found a few of those charges and I’m working to confirm that they are linked to the same individual. This story is ongoing.

    CAN Report Image
    CAN Report Image

  • Questions Raised After Arrest of a Substitute Teacher

    Questions Raised After Arrest of a Substitute Teacher

    A substitute teacher at Carver Elementary School was arrested and charged with indecent behavior with juveniles, according to public arrest records. The charge is an allegation, and the case is pending in court.

    The incident is alleged to have occurred on February 4, 2026. A family of one affected student says they were not notified immediately and only learned of the situation after their child disclosed it at home. To protect the child, no identifying information is being released, including gender or grade level.

    One family member briefly made a public post out of concern that other children may have been involved or exposed, noting that multiple students were present in the classroom at the time. The post was later removed after the family became worried that public discussion could further harm or identify the child. The child shared graphic details with their families about the occurrence — and how one child stated they felt trapped under the desk while the act was performed. The family says their intent was never public exposure, but to raise concern that some children may be afraid to speak up, especially if parents were never informed or asked to talk with their children.

    Shortly after that post, the school issued a brief public statement acknowledging that an allegation had been reported and referred to law enforcement, stating that the matter was under investigation and that no further comments could be made at that time. According to the family, that statement is the primary communication they have received.

    According to the family, they attempted to file a police report themselves but say they were unable to do so initially because they were not provided with key information, including the name of the substitute teacher involved. The family says they requested this information from the school and were denied access at the time, leaving them unable to complete a report without identifying details. They are now seeking clarity on why that information was not made available to them sooner and whether this aligns with district policy when parents are attempting to report alleged criminal conduct involving their child.

    One family reports the child is now experiencing severe anxiety and trauma-related symptoms and says no counseling or support services have been offered unless the family requested it. They are asking why parents of children who were present were not notified directly, whether additional students may have been affected, and what protocols exist to support children in situations involving alleged sexual misconduct.

    Because the school has publicly stated that no further comment is available, they are not currently providing additional statements. This remains an ongoing story. I am working closely with the family privately to advocate for them while prioritizing the child’s safety and well-being, and I will share updates as information can be responsibly confirmed.

    TLDR:
    A substitute teacher was arrested and charged with indecent behavior with juveniles. A family says they were not promptly notified, fears other children may have been affected, and worries some may be afraid to speak up because parents were not informed. The school issued a brief statement and says no further comment is available. This is an ongoing investigation.

    CAN Report Image
    CAN Report Image

  • Caldwell Parish Shooting — Update

    Following the February 28th incident involving reported gunfire on residential property where children were present, I spoke directly with the Sheriff to seek clarity on how this case is being handled.

    This is what was initially communicated during that meeting:

    The Sheriff initially stated that the children could not be considered victims because of where the bullets landed.

    He described the shooter as an elderly man and referenced possible cognitive decline, though no formal assessment was cited.

    Three statements have been collected thus far. One key individual reportedly left the scene without providing a statement, and the Sheriff indicated he would not move forward with a charging decision until that statement is obtained.

    During the course of the conversation, I pressed for clarity regarding victim classification and investigative standards. By the end of our discussion, the Sheriff acknowledged that the children would now be considered victims within the scope of the investigation and agreed to continue examining the situation from that perspective.

    I want to be clear:
    When gunfire occurs on residential property and minors are present, the community deserves a thorough, transparent, and unbiased investigation. The presence of children elevates the seriousness of any use of force.

    Self-defense is a legal standard. It is not a shield from scrutiny. It requires evidence of imminent threat and proportional response. Determining whether that standard is met must be based on documented facts, not familiarity with the parties involved, not assumptions, and not characterization.

    Multiple neighbors present described similar accounts of the incident. If there are conflicts in statements, those discrepancies should be clearly identified and evaluated individually, not broadly labeled without explanation.

    Justice is not about rushing to judgment. It is about methodical review and equal application of the law.

    But justice is also not about hesitation when public safety is involved.

    I appreciate the Sheriff’s willingness to give this matter a second look and to move forward with transparency. The community will continue watching closely, not for conflict, but for fairness and accountability. I will continue to press for justice and follow this story closely.

    Updates will be provided as more information becomes available.

  • Caldwell Parish Shooting Incident

    Location: Caldwell Parish

    I’ve seen the post circulating about the February 28th shooting incident in Caldwell Parish and those who tagged me. The mother who shared it has reached out, and I will be looking into the situation further.

    At this point, the details currently available are based on her public account. Allegations involving gunfire near children and concerns about law enforcement response are extremely serious and deserve careful review.

    Over the coming days, I will be requesting:
    – The official incident report
    – Body cam and dash cam footage
    – Any arrest records or charging decisions
    – Dispatch logs
    – Clarification on department protocol

    It’s important that we allow the facts and documentation to speak. My role is not to escalate emotions, but to examine the records and provide transparency.

    If you were a direct witness or have firsthand knowledge of the events, you may contact me privately.

    I will share updates as information becomes available.

  • Shopper’s Arrest Raises Questions at Walmart

    Shopper’s Arrest Raises Questions at Walmart

    Location: Monroe, LA

    A Monroe woman is speaking out after an encounter at the Walmart Supercenter on Louisville Avenue on December 9, 2025, that ended in her arrest. A nearly 10-minute video recorded during the incident is now circulating publicly and has sparked community discussion about trespass procedures, police communication, and how situations like this escalate.

    According to the shopper, she entered Walmart around 1:37 p.m. to look for Christmas presents for her son. She states that she purchased a candy bar and was not approached by any Walmart employee while inside the store regarding theft or store policy violations.

    In the video, the interaction begins as the shopper exits the store and is approached by a police officer who asks for her identification and informs her that she is being banned from the store. The shopper repeatedly asks why she is being banned and whether she is being detained. In the video, the officer does not clearly answer whether she is free to leave or being legally detained.

    The officer tells the shopper that she must sign a piece of paper in order to be legally trespassed from Walmart. She repeatedly asks whether signing the document is required. At different points in the video, the officer gives conflicting answers — first stating that she must sign it, and later stating that she does not have to.

    The shopper attempts to leave the area and is followed outside. She states that she was then physically grabbed and forced back into the store and into the asset protection office. She was subsequently arrested and charged with disturbing the peace, resisting arrest, and failure to identify.

    In the video, the shopper tells the officer multiple times that she does not have a physical ID but does verbally provide her name. There are also comments made during the encounter suggesting the officer may have looked inside her purse, though the video does not clearly establish whether consent was given or whether a search warrant was present.

    The video also includes statements indicating that the reason for the trespass may have been related to the shopper using a store outlet to charge her phone, not an allegation of theft. Walmart, like all private businesses, has the legal right to trespass individuals from their property. However, the video raises questions about how that process is communicated and enforced, particularly when instructions appear inconsistent.

    The shopper also states in the video that she is autistic and that public spaces like stores are sometimes used as a safe place for her. She references a prior interaction with law enforcement in which officers assisted her in reaching a local shelter rather than trespassing or arresting her, which she contrasts with this encounter.

    This story is not about determining guilt or innocence, nor does it make legal conclusions about whether any rights were violated. However, the video does raise concerns about clarity, communication, and escalation. Viewers may reasonably question whether clearer explanations — such as whether the shopper was legally detained, whether signing the trespass notice was required, and what consequences would follow refusal — could have prevented the situation from ending in an arrest.

    At minimum, the incident highlights the importance of clear procedures and consistent communication when law enforcement and private businesses work together, especially when interacting with individuals who may be vulnerable or confused by conflicting instructions.

    The full video is being shared for context so viewers can observe the interaction themselves and form their own opinions.

    Video link


    CAN Report Image

  • Richwood Police Chief Remains in Position After Felony Arrest

    Richwood Police Chief Remains in Position After Felony Arrest

    Power & Privilege — Laying the Foundation

    Court records confirm that on May 30, 2025, Richwood Police Chief Johnny Ray Cleveland was arrested and charged with Aggravated Battery (felony). An arrest warrant was issued the same day, along with a Louisiana Uniform Abuse Prevention Order that is effective through May 30, 2027.

    Local media outlets, including KNOE and KTVE, reported that Mayor Gerald Brown stated the Chief remains in his position but has been placed on “desk duty,” handling administrative responsibilities. The Monroe Dispatch has also reported that Cleveland is “not suspended, but inactive in investigations,” according to statements attributed to the mayor.

    Since that time, additional whistleblower communications have been received raising concerns about administrative leave policies, vehicle use, firearm restrictions under the protective order, payroll practices, and possible prior legal matters. These claims have not yet been independently verified. Public records requests are being prepared to obtain documentation and clarify policy compliance.

    A Louisiana Uniform Crash Report connected to a recent fatal crash on Highway 165 has also been reviewed. The crash narrative does not attribute fault to any responding officer in the report available. Claims regarding the Chief’s involvement in that incident remain unverified.

    At the center of this situation are broader questions about transparency and policy. What is Richwood’s administrative leave policy for a law enforcement officer facing a felony charge? What restrictions are in place while a protective order is active? What safeguards exist to protect the town from liability exposure?

    This is an ongoing matter. Updates will be provided as documentation is obtained and verified.

    Richwood, you deserve better. You deserve true leadership and transparency.


    CAN Report Image