Blog

  • Update: Visit to Grow NELA Office

    Series: The Richland Parish Data Center: Truth, Rumor & The Record

    On Tuesday, I stopped by the Grow NELA office to request records related to the Richland Parish Data Center project and get a better understanding of why my emails were going unanswered.

    I was told that as a private nonprofit entity, they are not required to provide records and that any further communication regarding such should be directed to their attorney.

    While it’s true that private nonprofits are not always subject to the same public records laws as government agencies, that does not automatically mean records are inaccessible in all circumstances — particularly when public infrastructure, public funding, and governmental coordination are involved, which is what I am working on clarifying for the public.

    Transparency can be simple. When an organization is operating in connection with major regional development, clarity builds public trust. Journalism aside, my personal opinion is that on a project of this magnitude and with so many rumors and reports of possible insider information, the easiest way to clarify things is by transparency without legal avenues.

    My request was straightforward and respectful. I will now pursue documentation through the appropriate public agencies and legal channels.

    The goal remains the same: transparency, accountability, and a clear understanding of process.

    More to come.

  • Bonus Feature: The Spillway

    Series: The Richland Parish Data Center: Rumor, Fact, and the Record

    During my investigation into the Richland Parish Data Center, Sharon Goldman and I began to uncover some news that wasn’t readily available to the public —

    There is evidence indicating that more phases are coming and the data center will multiply in size, adding massive continuation to the currently existing construction. As Sharon puts it: “The combined land parcels for the campus will bring the project to more than twice the size of the nearest international airport, Louis Armstrong in New Orleans.”

    While I will be writing about it in my series as well, I would love for you all to read Sharon’s informative article and support her work. She did some extra research and it’s a very interesting article.

    Sharon Goldman’s article on Fortune.com

  • Shopper’s Arrest Raises Questions at Walmart

    Shopper’s Arrest Raises Questions at Walmart

    Location: Monroe, LA

    A Monroe woman is speaking out after an encounter at the Walmart Supercenter on Louisville Avenue on December 9, 2025, that ended in her arrest. A nearly 10-minute video recorded during the incident is now circulating publicly and has sparked community discussion about trespass procedures, police communication, and how situations like this escalate.

    According to the shopper, she entered Walmart around 1:37 p.m. to look for Christmas presents for her son. She states that she purchased a candy bar and was not approached by any Walmart employee while inside the store regarding theft or store policy violations.

    In the video, the interaction begins as the shopper exits the store and is approached by a police officer who asks for her identification and informs her that she is being banned from the store. The shopper repeatedly asks why she is being banned and whether she is being detained. In the video, the officer does not clearly answer whether she is free to leave or being legally detained.

    The officer tells the shopper that she must sign a piece of paper in order to be legally trespassed from Walmart. She repeatedly asks whether signing the document is required. At different points in the video, the officer gives conflicting answers — first stating that she must sign it, and later stating that she does not have to.

    The shopper attempts to leave the area and is followed outside. She states that she was then physically grabbed and forced back into the store and into the asset protection office. She was subsequently arrested and charged with disturbing the peace, resisting arrest, and failure to identify.

    In the video, the shopper tells the officer multiple times that she does not have a physical ID but does verbally provide her name. There are also comments made during the encounter suggesting the officer may have looked inside her purse, though the video does not clearly establish whether consent was given or whether a search warrant was present.

    The video also includes statements indicating that the reason for the trespass may have been related to the shopper using a store outlet to charge her phone, not an allegation of theft. Walmart, like all private businesses, has the legal right to trespass individuals from their property. However, the video raises questions about how that process is communicated and enforced, particularly when instructions appear inconsistent.

    The shopper also states in the video that she is autistic and that public spaces like stores are sometimes used as a safe place for her. She references a prior interaction with law enforcement in which officers assisted her in reaching a local shelter rather than trespassing or arresting her, which she contrasts with this encounter.

    This story is not about determining guilt or innocence, nor does it make legal conclusions about whether any rights were violated. However, the video does raise concerns about clarity, communication, and escalation. Viewers may reasonably question whether clearer explanations — such as whether the shopper was legally detained, whether signing the trespass notice was required, and what consequences would follow refusal — could have prevented the situation from ending in an arrest.

    At minimum, the incident highlights the importance of clear procedures and consistent communication when law enforcement and private businesses work together, especially when interacting with individuals who may be vulnerable or confused by conflicting instructions.

    The full video is being shared for context so viewers can observe the interaction themselves and form their own opinions.

    Video link


    CAN Report Image

  • Richwood Police Chief Remains in Position After Felony Arrest

    Richwood Police Chief Remains in Position After Felony Arrest

    Power & Privilege — Laying the Foundation

    Court records confirm that on May 30, 2025, Richwood Police Chief Johnny Ray Cleveland was arrested and charged with Aggravated Battery (felony). An arrest warrant was issued the same day, along with a Louisiana Uniform Abuse Prevention Order that is effective through May 30, 2027.

    Local media outlets, including KNOE and KTVE, reported that Mayor Gerald Brown stated the Chief remains in his position but has been placed on “desk duty,” handling administrative responsibilities. The Monroe Dispatch has also reported that Cleveland is “not suspended, but inactive in investigations,” according to statements attributed to the mayor.

    Since that time, additional whistleblower communications have been received raising concerns about administrative leave policies, vehicle use, firearm restrictions under the protective order, payroll practices, and possible prior legal matters. These claims have not yet been independently verified. Public records requests are being prepared to obtain documentation and clarify policy compliance.

    A Louisiana Uniform Crash Report connected to a recent fatal crash on Highway 165 has also been reviewed. The crash narrative does not attribute fault to any responding officer in the report available. Claims regarding the Chief’s involvement in that incident remain unverified.

    At the center of this situation are broader questions about transparency and policy. What is Richwood’s administrative leave policy for a law enforcement officer facing a felony charge? What restrictions are in place while a protective order is active? What safeguards exist to protect the town from liability exposure?

    This is an ongoing matter. Updates will be provided as documentation is obtained and verified.

    Richwood, you deserve better. You deserve true leadership and transparency.


    CAN Report Image